The Israelis claim the raids were to destroy nuclear materials, the Syrians claim, uh, not anything, really. Gee, I wonder why the Syrians aren't complaining (or are delaying their complaining) about this?
From the article:
"But why would nuclear material be in Syria? Known to have chemical weapons, was it seeking to bolster its arsenal with something even more deadly? Alternatively, could it be hiding equipment for North Korea, enabling Kim Jong-il to pretend to be giving up his nuclear programme in exchange for economic aid? Or was the material bound for Iran, as some authorities in America suggest?"Well, certainly Hans Blix et al could give us definitive answers on all these questions . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment