Showing posts with label Liberals and Democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberals and Democrats. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 08, 2011

Republicans want to end public education!

I was alarmed to learn today--from a TN Democratic Party GOTV-for-Senate-District-6 email, that Republicans in Tennessee want to end public education:
Wining (sic) this deeply red district would be a political shocker and could deal a strong blow to Republicans’ extreme plan to end public education and hand over our democracy to lobbyists and special interests.
Thankfully all the Left's lobbyists and special interests--Labor Unions like the NEA come to mind, will fight tooth and nail to thwart the GOP's extreme plan . . .

Sunday, March 27, 2011

Sounds like the KGB to me

Well, Media Matters is dropping all pretense ("Media Matters' war against Fox") of not being a propaganda arm of the Left (ironically, MM vilifies FoxNews for being a propaganda arm of the GOP).

Watchdogging is one thing, but the tools at Media Matters are actually attempting to destroy an opposing voice. Losers.

Friday, March 04, 2011

Chip Forrester wields the "F" Word

Wow. In the weekly Tennessee Democratic Party Members' email to me and the millions of other supporters on their list (cough), Chip Forrester, the Democrats' Chairman, is calling Gov. Bill Haslam a fascist for attempting to rein in the out-of-control public employee Unions. I assume the follow up email will expound on how the story that Adolph Hitler--leader of the National Socialist Party in Germany, outlawed unions. Give me a break.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

A Horrid Crime, a Dishonest Debate - Andrew C. McCarthy - National Review Online

Here's another nice op/ed rebutting the Left's efforts to blame Conservatives for the AZ shooting ("A Horrid Crime, a Dishonest Debate" - Andrew C. McCarthy - National Review Online):
If wanton violence has a cause other than mental illness, it is a culture that lionizes the savages. That culture is not the culture of the Tea Partiers so despised by the Left. Many Tea Partiers are part of what until recently was called “the Christian Right,” an amorphous group of Americans, not all of whom are actually Christians, tied together by their shared acceptance of basic Judeo-Christian principles, such as equality and the sanctity of life (even the lives of their ideological opponents). They love liberty, because in their hands it is guided by virtue. It leads to the good life and the good society, not to dissipation and anarchy. Many of them pray for President Obama despite their revulsion at most of his policies. All of them consider him their president and would rally behind him if the good of the nation demanded it. Their dissent does not diminish their patriotism.

For our opinion elites, though, they are a punch line or, when disaster strikes, a punching bag. Those elites scoff at the very idea of real, knowable virtue — unless it is rhetorically useful in showing that America has failed to measure up. They would erase any traditional understanding of virtue from public life, replacing it with their vapid “values.” Under these, the young learn, a terrorist can still be a hero if he kills for noble reasons, if it becomes fashionable to deny the humanity of those he takes as his enemies.

Monday, August 30, 2010

Dems and economic politics over economic progress

This is an interesting discussion (Robert Barro: The Folly of Subsidizing Unemployment - WSJ.com) of how Democrats are wont to choose political gain over economic gain. First, Democrats are probably angling for the low tax policies of the Bush administration for political reasons more than economic ones. ("Democrats can't agree over killing or saving the Bush-era tax cuts - The Hill's On The Money). That's old news. BTW, that title should probably be "Democrats can't DECIDE about killing or saving the Bush-era tax cuts."

But second, the conversion of unemployment insurance to a welfare program--even though it has likely hurt Obama's resume on job creation, will still be a useful weapon for claiming that Republicans aren't as compassionate toward Americans.

Friday, August 13, 2010

Update: Will SC Dems pull a Lautenberg?

The Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in SC has been indicted (as forecast), but I'm wondering if anti-democratic (and moral relativist) Democrats will try to pull a Lautenburg to get a candidate they like on the ballot. I don't know what SC law is, but that didn't matter in NJ.

Aside: ol' Jim McGreevey makes an appearance in this story!

UPDATE: I like how CNN "Wire Staff" continue to look askance at Greene's candidacy (in particular, whether or not he is a stooge who didn't even pay his own filing fee):
The obscenity issue is one of several controversies swirling around Greene's long shot candidacy. Observers have also questioned how the 32-year-old nominee, who is believed to have very little personal wealth, was able to afford the $10,440 filing fee required to get his name on the Democratic Senate primary ballot.
South Carolina's top law enforcement agency said it determined that Greene used his own money to pay the fee, though the state attorney general's office said it did not receive a request from the agency to subpoena Greene's bank records.
Well, it appears (here) that a pretty thorough (and transparent) investigation disproves CNN's thesis. Great reporting CNN!!

Saturday, February 13, 2010

The "reality-based community's" president.

Rich Lowry highlight's "The president's reality problem.":
Obama came to office under fundamental misapprehensions that hamper him still. It's not true that all that was keeping the Israelis and Palestinians apart was the lack of US engagement, or that the Iranians were amenable to getting talked out of their nuclear program, or that Guantanamo Bay was a pointless contrivance.

Nor is it true that government is a sustainable source of economic growth, or a more efficient allocator of capital than the market. This is why Obama's stimulus program -- inevitably, a dog's breakfast of politically driven priorities -- is such a shambles that his aides never utter the word "stimulus" anymore. It is on to the next program, a nearly $100 billion "jobs" bill that reflects the touching belief that to work as intended a program only has to be named appropriately.

Monday, February 08, 2010

Those anti-democratic Democrats

("Dem. lieutenant governor candidate exits Ill. race" - chicagotribune.com):
CHICAGO - Now that the Democrats' nominee for lieutenant governor has dropped out of the race, the next step is up to the Illinois Democratic Party.
This is too common of an occurrence for Democrats. Torricelli. Kurita. Who needs primaries?

But, as we all know, the end justifies the means . . . right?


Update: Paterson in Democrats' sights . . .

Monday, January 18, 2010

Cheat? Yes, we know you would

After reading the histrionic, hand-wringing press release about "steal[ing] elections" from Tennessee Democrats (TNDP) over the weekend, this quote from Liberal mouthpiece Ed Schultz reminded me of the rub in cooperating with moral relativists. First, from the TNDP TN Democratic Party News » Blog Archive » Tennessee Senate Republicans Trample Over Voter Rights:
Tennessee Democratic Party Chairman Chip Forrester called yesterday’s action by the Senate to delay the Tennessee Voters Confidence Act a partisan move by Republican leadership to deny the state’s voters fair and accurate elections.


And here's the recording of Schultz candidly admitting he'd cheat to win in Massachusetts.
Yes, we know you would, Ed. And don't be so sure that your cronies in deep blue MA wouldn't accommodate your wishes.

Saturday, January 16, 2010

This is rich . . . TN Dems touting Democrats' thrift

Beneath the headline: "Undercutting Republican arguments about Democratic spending habits in Washington," the Tennessee Democratic Party (TNDP)--in its Friday email alert, is claiming that Democrats in Washington would make Dave Ramsey proud:
An analysis by the conservative Washington Times newspaper found that the current White House was successful in getting Congress to cut 24 spending programs and reduce nine other programs. White House administration officials note that Congress accepted at least $6.9 billion of the $11.3 billion in discretionary spending cuts President Obama proposed. The current administration's spending habits are in stark contrast with the previous administration, which cut trillions of dollars in taxes and added trillions of dollars to Medicare spending without paying for either.

Sunday, September 06, 2009

Re. Van Jones: "lies"? "distortions"?

Of course Van Jones would shamelessly would flat-out deceive about his critics, but what is Dr. Dean, M.D.'s excuse?Van Jones decries 'lies and distortions,'quits as Obama's environmental advisor -- latimes.com:
The only person Sunday to offer a defense of Jones was former Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean, who has emerged as a titular leader of the country's liberal movement.

Dean told 'Fox News Sunday' that Jones was "brought down," and he called it a "loss for the country."

He said that he had spoken with Jones, and that Jones should not be held responsible for signing the Sept. 11 petition.

"He was told by the people waving those clipboards around that he was signing something else," Dean said. "I think that's too bad."
Well, I think it's too bad that you have such contempt for Americans' intelligence. And it is interesting to see that Democrats aren't apologizing for Jones' Commie-ness.



For the record, I don't ever recall demanding or calling for Van Jones' resignation . . . I just think it's valuable to tar and feather a Marxist, though not run him out of town on a rail. Maybe people like me are who Jones was thinking of when he stated he had, "received encouragement from across the political spectrum to 'stay and fight.'"

Friday, September 04, 2009

Elementary principles of Obama's cookie jarred hand

Well, Liberals and Obama supporters are mocking concerns about plans by the Obama administration to speak directly to every school-aged child in America. But even though Democrats are flooding the media with fresh claims that the message was "to be about the need to work hard and stay in school," the facts are that this is their revised message. From reports:
"The Obama administration is rethinking its course recommendations for students ahead of President Obama's address to the the nation's schoolchildren next week, rewriting its suggestions to teachers for student assignments on how to 'help the president.'
. . . .
Among the activities initially suggested for pre-K to 6th grade students was to 'write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president.'

Another assignment for students after hearing the speech was to discuss what 'the president wants us to do.'
. . . .
Presidential aides also acknowledged to [the Washington Times] that they helped the U.S. Education Department write the suggested assignments, which stirred criticism by many who say Obama is trying to indoctrinate the education system."

In light of the creepy Pledge of Allegiance (to Obama) video (here), and the original lesson plans disseminated by Obama's Department of Education (and "presidential aides") non-koolaid-drinking parents legitimately questioned the motives and intent of this virtually unprecedented maneuver.

UPDATE: Libs (in this case blogger Mark Brown) are pulling out all the Soros-funded tools to defend the Obama administration's blatant political overreach. Holding up a Q&A by Reagan with four groups of middle school-aged visitors to the White House (here) and history teaching mat'ls available at the Reagan Library. Come on, just admit that you got busted Libs and we can all move on.

Thursday, September 03, 2009

Classless and stupid

Not only is the statement--by Obama czar Van Jones, that "Republicans are a**holes," offensive, the premise of it is laughable: that Republicans were able to ram through unpopular legislation while "bi-partisan" Obama and the Democrats have been stymied these past eight months:

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

MA Dems show their principle after Kennedy's death

Well, Sen. Ted Kennedy has passed away, and his loved ones deserve our condolences, but his passing has exposed some of those deep-seated democratic principles of Mass. Democrats clawing to keep control of his Senate seat:
Last week, Kennedy asked Massachusetts leaders to change state law to give Patrick the power to appoint an interim replacement to Kennedy's seat should Kennedy be unable to continue serving.

"It is vital for this commonwealth to have two voices speaking for the needs of its citizens and two votes in the Senate during the approximately five months between a vacancy and an election," Kennedy wrote in a letter to Patrick.

Lawmakers are weighing a bill now that honors Kennedy's request. Lawmakers are expected to hold a public hearing next month on the proposal, moving up the consideration date from October, and allowing legislation to be passed and signed into law before the deadline for a special election.

But a change in the law isn't a sure bet. Senate President Therese Murray and House Speaker Robert DeLeo, all Democrats, have stayed mum on whether they would support the change.

But Patrick told a local radio station Wednesday that he believes the proposal was "entirely reasonable" and said he would sign the bill if it reached his desk.

The state last changed its succession law in 2004 to require the special election. Before that the governor was allowed to name a successor. At the time, Democrats were worried that then-Republican Gov. Mitt Romney would be able to fill any vacancy created if Democratic Sen. John Kerry was elected president.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Who the grown-ups are (on foreign policy)

Andy McCarthy has a great op/ed about Congressional Dems' immature politics (Another Phony Scandal).

From the essay:
That is, while Democrats politicize “torture,” “domestic spying,” the Patriot Act, and now the CIA’s efforts to defeat al-Qaeda, Republicans are generally supporting Obama’s Pakistan policy for the greater good of protecting our national security.

Eventually, people do figure out who the grown-ups are.

Monday, July 13, 2009

What exactly is "historic" about her?

Patrick Leahy betrays (here) his identity politics:
Noting that only 101 people get a direct say in who sits on the Supreme Court, Mr. Leahy highlighted Judge Sotomayor's credentials.

"President Obama has done his part and made a historic pick, now the Senate has to do its part," he said.

Tuesday, July 07, 2009

Franken doesn't bring me flowers . . .

I was reading an Al Franken story this a.m., and was reminded of what I like about him. Franken said that he wanted to be "the people's proxy" during the Sotomayor hearings. From the story:
"As someone who will have been in the committee a grand total of six days and isn't an attorney I kind of see myself fulfilling a certain role for Americans watching the hearings," Franken said Monday in an interview with The Associated Press.

"So I kind of see myself as people's proxy, not that the other senators aren't, but certainly that's the kind of role I want to play," he said.
For the record, I always enjoyed the pre-political Al Franken's work . . . I can hardly believe that anyone wouldn't, so that's no big story, I guess. I think he would be a fun guy to know, as long as he didn't fly off the handle about Bushitler or something when we were hanging out. He's a real intellectual and creative talent and one common trait of a comedian is that they are able to laugh at themselves.

But it is hard for me to look past his decade-long vitriol for, and demonization of, anyone who holds Conservative political views. I guess he is akin to our Ann Coulter, and I'm even tempted as I type this to distinguish her from Franken or to offer a defense of her; but I can understand why some people don't like her.

Sort of like when the class clown becomes teacher for a day, here's hoping that Franken's new job--one in which bomb-throwing is disfavored, will change him for the better. I think it already has, based on the news coverage I've seen of him during his campaign and after the election.

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Making hay out of straw men

Give me a break, Forrester.

Goforth's email was definitely racist. I don't condone that kind of stuff, and it is doubly offensive that she used state property (and likely state time) to send the email.

But this was not racist.

And the "Magic Negro" bit was satire, making fun of LIBERALS' view of Obama.

Stereotyping Republicans as racists conveniently stokes the racial division in our state and country. Grow up Chip.

Monday, June 08, 2009

A "don't ask, don't tell" policy of their own

It appears the Left will need a new "don't ask, don't tell" policy of its own in dealing with the Obama's administration. Aubrey Sarvis: Under Obama "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Will Pass Away . Here's a nice screen shot from over at Huff Post.

Saturday, December 06, 2008

Northern exposure of universal plague

For the record, I thought it was a bad idea--when faced with the "credit crunch," for gov't officials to micro-manage the economy or attempt to counter market forces simply because the economy was headed for a rough patch and there were cries/threats that something--ANYthing, had to be done. That being said, this report about political chess-playing in Canada (TheStar.com | Canada | "Harper avoids the axe") provides a glimpse of what probably would have transpired here in the U.S. if Dubya et al had tried to stand in the way of Statist/Populist do-gooding:
"Prime Minister Stephen Harper appealed to his opposition rivals for economic advice in an attempt to defuse their outrage over the unprecedented shutdown of Parliament.

. . . .

Harper yesterday adopted a more conciliatory tone than he had since the crisis erupted over his government's economic statement on Nov. 27.

Liberals, NDP and the Bloc had united in opposition over its lack of measures to kick-start the sluggish economy. Moreover, proposed cuts to public subsidies for political parties and the suspension of public servants' right to strike were political dynamite.

The Prime Minister called on the opposition parties to 'engage with the government,' and cited Canadians' 'frustration' at all political parties for their failure to work together on the economic crisis.

'We are all responsible,' he said yesterday. 'The public is clear. They want us to discuss specific proposals and that we propose things, especially on things where we are able to find consensus.'"
Though "doing something" for the economy was the political football, the petty special concerns of the Left were the real rub in the matter. Ol' Heartless Harper wants to decrease the amount of public monies given to political parties and is not interested in preserving the ability of (ostensibly essential) public employees to strike.