. . . about my "huge" post on Dobson's endorsement of Huckabee.
Some are asserting (okay, everyone who's commenting on the matter is asserting) that
my post about James Dobson's endorsement of Mike Huckabee is over-stated or I-don't-know-what-all. It's rather unremarkable to say that it is "huge," for a couple of reasons.
1. James Dobson is an important leader among Evangelical Christians.
"William" may not care what he thinks,
"Southern Beale" may not care what he thinks,
Adam Kleinheider may not care what he thinks, but none of them are Evangelical Christians from what I've ever seen them write. That being said, Dobson's clout is only significant (for the purposes of my "huge" assertion) in the context of thing two, below.
2. This endorsement is a demonstration that at least one bloc of voters--Religious Conservatives, may be planning to
"not go gentle into that good night." There is
loads of speculation that Huckabee is angling for a VP slot. Maybe; only a handful of people know.
But part of the dynamic here is that while Romney,
Dubya et al are urging that Republicans get behind the presumptive GOP nominee, some Conservatives have concluded that a McCain-led GOP (and presidency) may not exactly be a "good night" at all. Ann Coulter is a prominent example. And while Coulter doesn't speak for the Religious Right, neither does Rush or Hannity. Dobson is another story, and what Dobson is saying is "let's keep on fighting." That's huge, and more of a story than the pre-Super Dooper Tuesday Campaign-for-Hillary threat by mistress of hyperbole Ann Coulter.