Sunday, February 28, 2010

Al Gore still saves

Ann Althouse has a fisky response to today's what-I-did-this-Winter essay from Al Gore(Althouse: "Al Gore would like you to lie back and accept what the government decides is good for you."):
[Gore writes:]
From the standpoint of governance, what is at stake is our ability to use the rule of law as an instrument of human redemption.


What?! I knew this was religion! We're supposed to believe. And please don't use 'rule of law' as a synonym for government regulation.
"We can't wish away climate change" . . . but can I wish away Al Gore?

Saturday, February 27, 2010

Ironically, climate alarmists now leaning on understatement

This article from the NYTimes is funny in its understatement of the situation. Independent Board to Review Work of Top Climate Panel - NYTimes.com. I like how the Reuters reporter dismisses the persistent and embarrassing reports over the last few weeks as "sporadic":
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been under fire since it was pointed out that the 2007 report included a prediction that Himalayan glaciers would vanish by 2035, although there is no scientific consensus to that effect.

That brief citation — drawn from a magazine interview with a glaciologist who says he was misquoted — and sporadic criticism of the panel’s leader have fueled skepticism in some quarters about the science underlying climate change. The climate panel’s assessments are a crucial source of guidance for policy makers addressing global warming.
With their credibility in shambles, what exactly is the basis for the climate alarmism again?

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Don't be surprised if you don't hear the term "nuclear option" for a while

Breitbart.tv » Obama & Dems in 2005: 51 Vote ‘Nuclear Option’ Is ‘Arrogant’ Power Grab Against the Founder’s Intent: Then-Sen. Joe Biden:
"I pray God when the Democrats take back control we don't make the kind of naked power grab you are doing."
And the ignorance displayed by people like Christopher Dodd--in relation to the system set up by America's founders, would be funny if it wasn't so consequential.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Haynes only likes him some Partisan Hedy

It's ironic that Joe Haynes, after bashing Republicans and Conservatives disinclined to rubber stamp a proclamation for TN ACLU's Hedy Weinberg, saw fit to distance himself from perhaps the only principled, non-reflexive Liberal stance Hedy has taken over 25 years:
"I haven't always agreed with Hedy... like when she was for the Ku Klux Klan marching (at an event in Pulaski years ago)," Haynes said when asked why he pushed a resolution praising Weinberg. "But I respect her. But she believes in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and has worked hard for 25 years for those principles."
On second thought, it complicates things when you consider the KKK's deep roots in the Southern Democratic Party.

"Family Guy" and the "baser" angels of our nature

The controversy over the Down's Syndrome episode of Family Guy is heating up with the woman who provided the voiceover for the Down's Syndrome character entering the story. (‘Family Guy’ Voice Actor Says Palin ‘Does Not Have a Sense of Humor’ - ArtsBeat Blog - NYTimes.com)

While I am uncomfortable with the PC-ish complaints from Sarah Palin, I can certainly sympathize with her concern about her political enemies attacking her through her children (e.g., David Letterman). For the record, I think this is more of a "what-might-a-bossy-Down's Syndrome-teenager-say-to-try-and-impress" joke than anything else.

I'm also amused (somewhat) at how Lefties think anything that mocks or irritates Sarah Palin is a hoot. And it seems in bad taste to use (especially after the fact) a mentally disabled woman as a political tool.

To the credit of the NYTimes, it left off the petty, less-flattering comment from Andrea Fay Friedman's email in making the point that there are differences of opinion among Down's advocates (and Lib commenters are laughably acting as if the NYTimes is conspiring in favor--or fear, of Sarah Palin, see below).

24.
The Other Armenian
Ann Arbor
February 18th, 2010
7:47 pm
I find it very interesting that the NYT neglected to print the last part of Ms. Friedman's letter. The right wing has accused the media of being unfair to Sarah the P. The NYT also seems to be frightened of appearing critical to Palin. Had the media done their job Ms. Palin would have been torn to shreds and left in the dust bin of history in September of 2008.

Speaking of neglect; has anyone else noticed that Bristol Palin appears to be Trig's primary caregiver.


25.
lastcallsally
new york
February 18th, 2010
7:47 pm
I'm sick of this equal opportunity offender defense. The mentally disabled lack the ability to stand up for themselves but if you want to use them for some anti-Palin rant go ahead you tool.

"Hero"? Try "loser" ; Update: another destructive "hero"

Texas Suicide Pilot Joe Stack's Daughter, Samantha Bell, Calls Dad a Hero, Texas IRS Plane Attack 'Inappropriate' - ABC News

As far as I'm concerned, the left-handed condolences of Joe Stack's daughter aren't welcome, and I hope her 15 minutes of attention are over.

But the evolving storyline on Stack et al bothers me. This guy's acts of anti-gov't/anti-tax protest were insane and abominable.  I almost hate to soften the criticism by hinting at insanity, and I'm not sure "abominable" is a strong enough word.

People need to realize that protest is not enough.  We need constructive activism, which does not include blanket-mailing form letter diatribes to Congressmen (ref. Stack's "suicide" note) and flying planes into occupied office buildings.


Update:
Here's another "hero" in Ohio, this time with a bulldozer. Of course, the bank is evil in all this. Dude expects the bank to accept $80k as a payoff of $160k mortgage.

Friday, February 19, 2010

Is this a joke? . . . Tiger Woods' Mistress Wants Apology - ABC News

Gloria Allred says her client, "this former porn star," demands an apology, by name and an in-person meeting . . . watch the video.

Tiger Woods' Mistress Wants Apology - ABC News

Tiger's near perfect pitch shot

Although the transcript of Tiger Woods' apology today is better than his stilted and near-robotic performance, I have to say that his sentiments were right on.TigerWoods.com: Transcript: Tiger's public statementThat being said, I couldn't help but notice the seeming importance of defending against assertions that there had ever been domestic violence in their home (defending Elin's honor was right, but in relation to himself, Tiger almost seems to be splitting hairs given the extent of his infidelity).

And I'm not sure that (extraneous) rumors about performance enhancing drugs needed to be brought up in this particular forum. Maybe he wanted to be able to include that subject whenever asserting the "old news/zone of privacy" diversion hereafter.

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Quote of the day

Regarding the break-up of the three-year-old "U.S. Climate Action Partnership"BP, ConocoPhillips and Caterpillar Pull Out of Climate Partnership - WSJ.com:
"The saying in Washington is that if you're not at the table, you're on the menu," said Whitney Stanco, an energy policy analyst for Concept Capital, a Washington research firm.


Honorable mention goes to Mitt Romney in his opening remarks to CPAC:
I spent the weekend in Vancouver. As always, the Olympic Games were inspiring. But in case you didn’t hear the late-breaking news, the gold medal in the downhill was taken away from American Lindsey Vonn. It was determined that President Obama is going downhill faster than she is.

This just in from the greatest generation . . .

Heartwarming Charles Kuralt-ish video report about an octogenarian and her car.

Tax cuts haven't increased our budget deficit

In the midst of a CBS radio(?) report about Obama's announcement of a "deficit panel" the reporter described all the (external-to-Obama-and-Democrats) factors that have contributed to the current RECORD deficit. The last one mentioned was "tax cuts" . . . well, that's not true. It's the spending, stupid. Hillsdale College - Imprimis Issue:
The real undeniable test of tax policy is not short-term shifts in revenue but long-term shifts in spending that are most clearly manifested by increases in the federal budget. Between 1981 and 2004, current government spending in terms of dollars increased fivefold while the total hovered a little above 20 percent of GDP.

In the mid-1980s, World Bank economist Keith Marsden showed how this is possible: Low tax countries increase their spending three times faster than comparable high tax countries. This is because the low tax economies grow six times faster. For most of the period since World War II, the fastest growing economy in the world, with the fastest growth in government spending, was Hong Kong, with a top rate of 16 percent. A study by Jude Wanniski at Polyconomics extended the analysis through the Reagan era, with the same results. In recent years, Ireland, New Zealand and Russia massively increased spending after drastically reducing tax rates. Russia has increased outlays by some 60 percent after enacting a 13 percent flat tax.

Obama starts looking toward next election

Speaking of audacity . . . President Obama is now decrying deficit spending: UPDATE 1-Obama names deficit panel, gives it wide leeway | Reuters.

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Misreading Bayh's departure

John Fund describes how the MSM (not to mention the Left) is misreading Evan Bayh's departure ("Why Evan Bayh Is Quitting the Senate" - WSJ.com). From the article:
At age 54, Mr. Bayh is leaving Congress but declines to rule out another run for office. Should Democrats ever be open to a Tony Blair message, no doubt Mr. Bayh could be persuaded to return to the arena. He's won five times in a red state while compiling a voting record significantly more liberal than Arlen Specter's or Olympia Snowe's. Yet today he's viewed by many Democrats with disdain as a conservative collaborator.

Nothing better sums up the Democrats' self-inflicted problem.

A couple things about the Amy Bishop case

Wow. The emerging details about UAH murderer Amy Bishop are fascinating. Survivor: Ala. prof in slayings shot methodically - BostonHerald.com.

1. Though hindsight is 20/20, the facts surrounding Bishop's killing of her brother in 1986 are pretty troubling. It'll be interesting to see how this evolving story will affect the political fortunes of Democratic Congressman William Delahunt:
He said there were no ballistics tests included, and he also thought it odd that there was an 11-day gap between the death and interviews with family members, apparently because they were too distraught to talk sooner.

The Norfolk County district attorney at the time was William Delahunt, now a Democratic congressman from Massachusetts. He was traveling in Israel and could not immediately be reached for comment on the case.


2. Though it is almost impossible to predict how you would react if you had been among the faculty members in that UAH Biology Department meeting, I was stunned to read these details of how they handled the situation:
[UAH Associate Professor] Joseph Ng told the AP the shooting stopped almost as soon as it started. He said the gun seemed to jam and he and others rushed Bishop out of the room and then barricaded the door shut with a table.

Ng said the charge was led by Debra Moriarity, a professor of biochemistry, after Bishop aimed the gun at her and attempted to fire. When the gun didn’t shoot, Moriarity pushed her way to Bishop, urged her to stop, and then helped force her out the door.

'Moriarity was probably the one that saved our lives. She was the one that initiated the rush,' he told the AP. 'It took a lot of guts to just go up to her.'

Ng said the survivors worried she would shoot her way through the door, and frantically worked up a backup plan in case she burst through. But she never did.
(emphasis added). Yes, Bishop could have shot her way back in . . . or started shooting students or others elsewhere in the building.

3. Though I sympathize with the family members and loved ones of the UAH victims, I do not see how a typical hiring process would have alerted UAH to Amy Bishop's past "issues."

Sunday, February 14, 2010

Damned if we're post racial, damned if we're not . . .

This article is intriguing in light of Harold Ford, Jr.'s yankee-patronizing comments about how Tennesseans would frown on his inter-racial marriage. The Woman Behind Harold Ford - The Daily Beast:
There were a number of reasons for wanting to keep [Ford, Jr.'s relationship with his then caucasian and now wife] quiet. For one, it was relatively new. For another, a month before his defeat, the RNC put out a now-infamous commercial featuring an actress who claimed to have met Ford at a party at the Playboy Mansion. “Call me,” she mouths at the end. The ad smacked of racism—implying that he was somehow unfit for office because he was a womanizer who liked white girls. (In point of fact, the ad was also deceptive; Ford is said to have been fairly indifferent to race where the women in his life are concerned. He was formerly engaged to a black woman.) Even though the ad was vilified, it did its damage.
The point was that he was a playboy (playa?), not that he dated white women.*

BTW, here's the humorous (and effective) ad:








*Incidentally, there's some interesting dirt in the article about Ford, Jr.'s level of playboy-ness:
About five years ago, [Ford's wife] met Ford at a wedding in New Orleans. At the time, he was known in political circles as something of a player. Says one woman who dated him briefly: “He pursued women vigorously and passionately, there’d be a week or 10 days of him being totally obsessive and then it was over. With me he just didn’t show up for a date.
Wow.


Hat tip, The Agenda.

Saturday, February 13, 2010

The "reality-based community's" president.

Rich Lowry highlight's "The president's reality problem.":
Obama came to office under fundamental misapprehensions that hamper him still. It's not true that all that was keeping the Israelis and Palestinians apart was the lack of US engagement, or that the Iranians were amenable to getting talked out of their nuclear program, or that Guantanamo Bay was a pointless contrivance.

Nor is it true that government is a sustainable source of economic growth, or a more efficient allocator of capital than the market. This is why Obama's stimulus program -- inevitably, a dog's breakfast of politically driven priorities -- is such a shambles that his aides never utter the word "stimulus" anymore. It is on to the next program, a nearly $100 billion "jobs" bill that reflects the touching belief that to work as intended a program only has to be named appropriately.

More evidence of weather alarmist science-denying

FOXNews.com - The Next Climate-gate?:
But probably the most damaging report has come from Joseph D’Aleo, the first Director of Meteorology and co-founder of the Weather Channel, and Anthony Watts, a meteorologist and founder of SurfaceStations.org.

In a January 29 report, they find that starting in 1990, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) began systematically eliminating climate measuring stations in cooler locations around the world. Yes, that's right. They began eliminating stations that tended to record cooler temperatures and drove up the average measured temperature. The eliminated stations had been in higher latitudes and altitudes, inland areas away from the sea, as well as more rural locations. The drop in the number of weather stations was dramatic, declining from more than 6,000 stations to fewer than 1,500.

D’Aleo and Watts show that the jumps in measured global temperature occur just when the number of weather stations is cut. But there is another bias that this change to more urban stations also exacerbates. Recorded temperatures in more urban areas rise over time simply because more densely populated areas produce more heat. Combining the greater share of weather stations in more urban areas over time with this urban heat effect also tends to increase the rate that recorded temperatures tend to rise over time.

Their report provides examples of how the systematic elimination of stations and unexplained adjustments in temperature data caused measured temperatures to rise for Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Norway, Sweden, and the United States. Many adjustments change what would have been a drop in temperatures into an increase. Take New Zealand, where D’Aleo and Watts note: “About half the adjustments actually created a warming trend where none existed; the other half greatly exaggerated existing warming.”


And Mona Charen opines on the Left's anti-scientific methodism:sums it up nicely:
The entire superstructure of climate alarmism rests on data that are doubtful and possibly fraudulent. The Science and Public Policy Institute has evaluated surface-temperature records and found, among other things, that 1) instrumental data from the pre-satellite era are virtually useless; 2) fewer than 25 percent of the 6,000 temperature stations that once existed are still operative; 3) comprehensive ocean data have been available only since 2003 and have shown no warming; and 4) higher altitude, higher latitude, and rural stations were the most likely to be lost, leading to a further serious overstatement of warming.

As John Hinderaker of the Power Line blog has reported, the U.N. IPCC report itself does not even accurately represent the views of the scientists who signed it. Key sections expressing caveats and acknowledging countervailing evidence were altered after the purported authors had put their names to it.

It isn’t the snow outside that has discredited global warming. It’s the chill the warmists have imposed on scientific inquiry. They are acting as enforcers of orthodoxy, not seekers of truth.

Krugman's semANTICS

I had to comment on Paul Krugman's multiple references (in this NYTimes op/ed Op-Ed Columnist - Republicans and Medicare - NYTimes.com) to "Republican cuts to Medicare" as opposed to "Democratic cost savings" within the same sentence.

That being said, I will admit that I am not comfortable when I see Republicans sugar-coating policies to appeal to older voters--Newt Gingrich is the king of this, by lauding FDR's "Progressive"/Socialist policies/programs like Medicare.

Friday, February 12, 2010

Adjustments to the Leviathan

. . . adjustments like the ones people get from a chiropractor.

Folks are reporting that Sen. Bob Corker is working with Democrats to tweak government regulation of the finance industry. It pains me to hear such a disingenuous boob as Chris Dodd saying positive things about Corker, and I think Dodd is untrustworthy, and I don't think the Democrats' proffered solutions (which, as is often the case, are built upon flawed premises) won't help matters, but maybe Corker can wrest some positive changes from the majority party. After all, officials in the image-over-substance party are DESPERATE to pass something. From the article: Republican Breaks Ranks on Finance Bill - WSJ.com:
WASHINGTON—Republican Sen. Bob Corker bucked his party Thursday and began negotiations with Democrats on overhauling financial regulation.

Winning the first-term Tennessee senator's support is perhaps the White House's best chance of passing a financial-overhaul bill this year. Democrats need one Republican to reach the 60 votes required to pass legislation in the Senate. Democrats hope Mr. Corker's support also could bring along other centrist Republicans.

Mr. Corker's involvement means the Federal Reserve could play a bigger role in any overhaul, because the senator has been less critical of the central bank than other leading Republicans. He also opposes creating a stand-alone consumer-protection agency, an idea already on life support, but might agree to propose other policies governing products such as mortgages.
Here are some ideas as Corker endeavors to manipulate the nation's financial spine.