Watching this video, I am reminded of how much I admire(d) Clarence Thomas (watch until the end)
That being said, I like Cain, but regrettably, his situation seems different than the attacks on Clarence Thomas. There seems to be more to the allegations against Cain, to include actual complaints filed, actual legal settlements, third-party witnesses, etc. Frankly, where there's this much smoke . . .
However, I think the ugliest thing about "sexual harassment" is that it is so subjective and so patronizing to females, and it is so hypocritical for Democrats. Libs, who foster sexualization of every part of our culture (and thereby encourage women to assert sexual leverage) and who pooh-pooh traditional values and who try to pretend that there is no difference between men and women act like flirting or telling a dirty joke is a Federal offense (at least when Republicans do it). DEMS IGNORED A SITTING PRESIDENT HAVING SEX WITH AN UNPAID INTERN, FOR HEAVEN'S SAKE . . . and now they're pursuing this story like it is some big deal?
While it bothers me to think that Cain might have been unfaithful to his wife and have violated the teachings of his faith, I think that we shouldn't let the Liberal media establishment frame this debate and drive this story.
Mayor Berke?
14 hours ago
2 comments:
"DEMS IGNORED A SITTING PRESIDENT HAVING SEX WITH AN UNPAID INTERN, FOR HEAVEN'S SAKE . . . and now they're pursuing this story like it is some big deal?"
Why do you think Democrats are the ones pursuing this story? The media is, yes, because scandals attract more of an audience than issues...but Democrats love Cain, we want desperately for the GOP to pick him as their nominee. So, if any Democrat was behind this story, that person needs to be excommunicated from the party.
Good point. Of course most Dems can't help themselves, but your point pretty much emphasizes the thesis of my post.
Post a Comment