WASHINGTON (AP) — Harvard biologist and runner Daniel Lieberman had a simple question: "How did people run without shoes?"(emphasis added) Hmmmm, maybe such shoes work against the foot's design, at best they work against the foot's structure.
The answer he got is: Much better.
At least running barefoot seems better for the feet, producing far less impact stress compared to feet shod in fancy, expensive running shoes, according to a study by Lieberman in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature. The study concludes that people seem to be born to run — barefoot.
. . . .
Tonino said cushioned running shoes work against evolution which developed the foot properly for endurance running.
Mayor Berke?
14 hours ago


0 comments:
Post a Comment